Research
Student Mental Health Research Network (SMaRteN): First Funding Call and Sandpit
26 February 2019
OHE is a collaborator on SMaRteN, and we’ve just announced the first funding call on “What is distinctive about student mental health?”
Recommendations for Making Outcome-based Payments a Reality in the NHS: An Application to Cancer Drugs
21 February 2019
Making Outcome-based payments a reality in the NHS authored by The Office of Health Economics, RAND Europe, King’s College London, and Cancer Research UK, and commissioned…
End of Life Treatments, Societal Values, and ‘Overall’ Preference
12 February 2019
OHE’s Koonal Shah gave a presentation on societal values and the provision of end of life treatments at a Manchester Centre for Health Economics seminar.
Generating Preference-based Values for the EQ-5D-Y to Support Its Use in HTA
31 January 2019
OHE’s Koonal Shah and Oliver Rivero-Arias presented at a NICE Technical Forum on the topic of valuing health in children and adolescents.
OHE Achievements in 2018
27 December 2018
This year, the OHE team published 39 peer reviewed journal articles, gave 58 lectures and conference presentations, posted 22 in-house OHE publications on our website, and…
“You Don’t Always Get What You Want”: Output Distortion and NHS Waiting Time Targets
18 December 2018
The latest publication from Professor Graham Cookson in Public Organization Review finds that waiting time targets adopted in the English NHS as part of the ‘targets…
A Note on the Relationship Between Age and Health-related Quality of Life Assessment
12 December 2018
A new OHE-authored paper on the relationship between age and health-related quality of life has been published in Quality of Life Research.
New NICE Position Statement – 5L Value Set Still ‘On Hold’
29 November 2018
NICE has issued a new position statement regarding the use of the EQ-5D-5L value set in evidence submitted to its HTA process.
EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England Study Team Responds to the EEPRU Review
29 November 2018
OHE has published a response to the critique of the EQ-5D-5L value set for England study.