In 2008, the European Commission published a proposal for a Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border health care. This followed two 1998 landmark rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that appeared to affirm the right of patients to obtain reimbursement from their own health care systems for health care that they purchased from another EU Member State, without prior authorization.
This Briefing reports the discussions of a group of experts at an OHE workshop on the benefit-risk assessments of drugs. The objective was to identify how particular tools and methods used in economic analysis and the decision sciences might improve the methodologies that regulatory authorities apply to evaluate drug benefit and risk.
In June 2006, a conference entitled Better Analysis for Better Decisions: Bridging the Gap Between Economic Evaluation and Healthcare Decision-Making was held at McMaster University in honour of the late Bernie O’Brien. The papers presented by leading health economists were reviews of the use of economic evaluation in the UK, Canada and USA, and more methodologically focused contributions.
The reviews of the experience in the three countries suggest that economic analysis is playing an increasingly important role in health sector decision making.
This Briefing discusses, inter alia, the role of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) in competition cases affecting the pharmaceutical industry. It does so in the context of a discussion of “ex ante” versus “ex post” approaches to regulation. This refers to the balance of reliance in a market on competition, sector specific regulation, and general competition law to deliver efficient outcomes.
Health care decision makers are becoming increasingly concerned with obtaining value for money and therefore with the use of economic evidence, particularly as a criterion for the reimbursement of new pharmaceuticals. There are a range of countries in which economic considerations have been introduced into the decision making process together with some of the associated policy applications.
Towse, A., Fenn, P., Gray, A., Rickman, N. and Salinas, R.
The UK government hopes that the proposals in the report of the Department of Health’s Chief Medical Officer "Making Amends" (CMO, 2003) will make its NHS safer whilst ensuring that patients who are harmed get compensation more quickly and more efficiently than at present. The Making Amends proposals seek to achieve this by setting up administrative mechanisms for compensating patients. These will provide an alternative to the existing court based "tort" system, whereby patients sue doctors and hospitals for negligence in order to get compensation. These changes should be helpful.
From 1 April 1999 the structure of the Health Services in the United Kingdom will look radically different. In England there will be Primary Care Groups (PCGs), in Scotland Primary Care Trusts, and in Wales Local Health Groups. The pattern in Northern Ireland is still awaited. These different solutions for England, Scotland and Wales have one thing in common; they are being introduced across the board for the whole population untried and untested.
This OHE Briefing summarises the presentations and discussion at the session on 'Efficacy to cost-effectiveness' at the Conference of the International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care (ISTAHC) in Barcelona on 26 May 1997.
The aim of this paper is to consider recent trends in the volume and characteristics of economic evaluation literature by interrogating the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED), and to offer some comments on how the quality of such studies can be assessed by reviewing existing work which has considered this issue. HEED has been developed as a joint initiative between the Office of Health Economics (OHE) and the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Associations (IFPMA).